Please tell me if you think?

Fortune: you're taking too much of what I said, also, please respect people who suffered (or died) due to actual nazis by not using the word as a cheap insult. It too is clear from what I wrote to whom I was referring with the statement, and to simplify my words even more:

I'm saying there are people who think women did nothing to contribute to the world, and I'm saying not only they are wrong because there have been women scientists, mathematicians, inventors, and more; but they are even the more wrong because they are assuming the roles traditionally ascribed to females are less important or easy, which, they aren't.

I hope you understand now.

Fortune: you're taking too much of what I said, also, please respect people who suffered (or died) due to actual nazis by not using the word as a cheap insult. It too is clear from what I wrote to whom I was referring with the statement, and to simplify my words even more:

I'm saying there are people who think women did nothing to contribute to the world, and I'm saying not only they are wrong because there have been women scientists, mathematicians, inventors, and more; but they are even the more wrong because they are assuming the roles traditionally ascribed to females are less important or easy, which, they aren't.

I hope you understand now.

Eyehaveyou: I'm not, I'm not saying all men are acknowledged, I'm saying it seems to be a rule that if you are female, you won't be acknowledged.

Fortune: Here I am pasting again my question, you must have skipped this part:

"I really think it's unfair to systematically exclude females from books students see,"

Then I mentioned these names:

Hypatia of Alexandria, Maria Gaetana Agnesi, Sophie Germain, Maria Montessori and Emmy Noether.

These have been outstanding in their fields, and my point is they are not mentioned in didactic books when they should. Einstein, Newton, Ramanujan, Leibniz, all of these appear and are discussed in the classroom. I am saying they get less recognition BECAUSE they are women. Now do you understand? If not, please read again.

That I am a feminazi is not true. If it is obvious to you, maybe you should see about this mind of yours.

That my argument should not be addressed or discussed, but waved away with "being the feminist that you are you think x" is simply lame, and you confess your own ignorance and inability at countering my points for what they are.

Yes, I am a fe

Yes, I am a feminist.

No, that does not mean that what I type is automatically less correct than what you or anyone smarter than you type.

Obs.: You are advised to read the entire response twice, to ensure a minimal understanding. If you read three times and still don't understand anything, it's time to sleep and rest that little head of yours, then, once you're well for your standards, get back and try again.

Yes, I am a feminist.

No, that does not mean that what I type is automatically less correct than what you or anyone smarter than you type.

Obs.: You are advised to read the entire response twice, to ensure a minimal understanding. If you read three times and still don't understand anything, it's time to sleep and rest that little head of yours, then, once you're well for your standards, get back and try again.