Serious question for creationists..?

It's simple. If evolution can be proven, the organisms are of the same "kind". If it can't, they are of different "kinds". You have to learn to think like a creationist..

BTW, the plural of "genus" is "genera".

Yet another answer asserting that Charles Darwin was the be-all and end-all of evolution. He sorted out a few things and made a few hypotheses which turned out to be correct 25 years or so after he died.

The word "kind" is used by creationists because it can mean anything they want it to mean. Loose or no definitions of this or that are the basis of most of their arguments, when they are not indirectly or directly lying.

You asked -'Do you have a specific definition of what a 'kind' is and what separates one from another?'

The word 'kind' is not a term within the scientific community, as a whole or specifically among biologists.

The word 'kind' comes from primitive humans, before 300 C.E. & is contained the storybook called the Bible.

In biology, the words of species, sub-species, etc. is one of the basic units of biological classification and a taxonomic rank. A species is often defined as the largest group of organisms capable of interbreeding and producing fertile offspring.

As you say, 'kind' is meaningless in a biological sense because, like everything creationists say, it is too vague. They use this term to justify myths like Noah's arc where, say, a cat was on board to represent the feline 'kind'.

Apparently, all the extinct and extant felines since then were derived from this arc cat. If that isn't evolution, what is?? They cannot comprehend the major error in their own fallacy.

They mean it in exactly the same sense that Charles Darwin did (more than 100 times) in his text On the Origin of Species.

If as Made from Embryonic Stem Cells asserts the word is meaningless in a biological sense, then apparently Darwins text is meaningless in a biologial sense because that is the word Darwin used more frequently than any other word to describe organisms.

Of their own kind ,it has yet to be proven that the genus pan and the genus **** are different species, I suggest that one of those creationists step up and prove once and forever they are different species.

It's obvious. A lion is a different kind than an elephant. However, an elephant may be the same kind as a mammoth. Just use your eyes.